Pixel response times vs. overshoot @ 60 and 175 Hz refresh rate
Basically, it is almost unnecessary to measure the response times and overshoot on an OLED. Depending on the measurement method, the response time is between 0.1 and 0.3 ms. The best case is actually 0.03 ms, if you only measure the 80 percent of the transition from gray to gray according to the international standard procedure. Nevertheless, I will of course take a look at this, as there can also be differences with OLEDs.
See LG’s 27GR95QE, where – completely unexpectedly for me personally – overshoot occurs, albeit barely perceptible. It’s always worth taking a look, which some other editors like to leave out completely when it comes to OLEDs. Let’s see what Samsung has to offer here.
Typical OLED – blazing fast. Compared to the MEG342C, the OLED G8 is actually slower – if you can call it slow – at 0.2 ms on average. On the other hand, you can actually say that the OLED G8 has no perceptible overshoot at all.
Please note that the UFO recording on the BenQ XL2566K was made at only 240 FPS. The motion clarity looks correspondingly “worse” compared to the other monitors. If in doubt, please take a look at the recordings from my colleagues Tim (HW UB) or Simon (TFT Cental). The point is to make it clear that an OLED with a significantly lower refresh rate is equal to – if not better than – an LCD panel.
- 1 - Introduction, Features and Specs
- 2 - Workmanship and Details
- 3 - How we measure: Equipment and Methods
- 4 - Pixel Response Times
- 5 - Display Latencies
- 6 - Color-Performance @ Default Settings
- 7 - Direct Comparison and Power Consumption
- 8 - Color-Performance calibrated
- 9 - HDR-Performance
- 10 - Summary and Conclusion
328 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Urgestein
Urgestein
Neuling
Veteran
Mitglied
Moderator
Veteran
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
Urgestein
Moderator
Moderator
Veteran
Veteran
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Urgestein
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →