Latency and CPU performance are decisive in the ancient SuperPi 32M, so FCLK is one of the most noticeable here. Here, too, the “Aggressive” subtiming preset cuts a good figure and is only just beaten by the fully optimized setups.
In Pyprime 2.0, effectively only the latency to RAM counts and the order is thus effectively identical to the AIDA64 latency test. 24% time savings can be achieved here in the best case, whereby the EXPO configurations are again a good middle ground. In addition, the disadvantage of the 2:1 configuration is greater here, which means that the configuration comes very close to JEDEC RAM with its result.
Finally, there is the 3DMark Timespy CPU score, where the Infinity Fabric again has almost no impact, but the RAM with its timings does. Here again the manually optimized configs are ahead, with Samsung B-Die in 3rd place, closely followed by the 6000 EXPO with Aggressive Preset.
- 1 - What's new with Ryzen 7000?
- 2 - Test Setup and Software Tools
- 3 - BIOS Settings (1/2) – DDR5
- 4 - BIOS Settings (2/2) – CPU-OC and other
- 5 - Tested Configurations (1/2)
- 6 - Tested Configurations (2/2)
- 7 - Synthetics (1/2) – LinpackXtreme, AIDA64, Geekbench 3
- 8 - Synthetics (2/2) – SuperPi 32M, PyPrime 2.0 2B, Timespy CPU
- 9 - Gaming QHD, FHD – ACC, CSGO, SoTR
- 10 - Summary and Recommendations
221 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
Veteran
Mitglied
Urgestein
1
Urgestein
Veteran
Urgestein
Urgestein
Veteran
Urgestein
Veteran
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Neuling
Mitglied
Mitglied
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →