Latency measurement in comparison
Of course, I also measured the two MSI rodents in familiar form with NVIDIA LDAT (E2E). How I perform the latency measurements, you can learn here in this article.
Wireless vs. wired mice – we measure the latency differences! | NVIDIA LDAT V2 in the field test
So, with that out of the way, let’s get to the official results. Did either of them manage to knock the ASUS ROG Chakram Core off its throne?
I was surprised! Both mice are on the same level as the Sharkoon Light² 100 and 200 and the ASUS ROG Pugio II that I tested. Okay, 4 ms to the ASUS ROG Chakram Core is not the end of the world. But, both mice are NVIDIA Reflex certified and I expected the performance of the Chakram Core. Probably it is once again due to the fact that you cannot set the key reaction time (bounce/debounce time). I would like to see that especially for eSports gamers. If already NVIDIA Reflex – in the sense of latency minimization, then this also belongs to it!
What we can say is that both MSI mice are on par with each other. Which supports the fact that it now makes no difference whether you play with dongle or cable. Attention: With Bluetooth (BT) mice (see Pugio II in BT mode) you have to consider that the latency increases.
Soundcheck
Then let’s listen to the different keys on one of the two mice. There is no sonic difference here, so the MSI Glutch GM41 Lightweight Wireless is quite enough:
Left mouse button
Right mouse button
Mouse wheel scroll and click
Thumb keys
There isn’t much else to report about the two MSI nangers either. It’s time for today’s conclusion. Last page please!
7 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Mitglied
Moderator
Urgestein
Mitglied
Veteran
Veteran
Veteran
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →