Rendering
It’s the same as always, of course: a good renderer needs invigorating core feed, it always has. My beloved igoBOT is a grateful task there, even if rendering on the CPU is slowly going out of fashion. But before I use things like Cinebench, which also delivers completely inconsistent values (3 measurements, 4 results), I run something like this, which can run for a few minutes.
We see the “normal” Ryzen 7 5800X ahead of the X3D in both cases because the clock beats the cache again here.
Encoding, financial service and programming
The first two benchmarks also benefit many cores again, with FSI being pure compute. However, since both compared CPUs only have 8 cores, they consequently have to place themselves in the middle, with clock advantages for the Ryzen 7 5800X.
However, Intel is still the measure of all things in Python and even more so Octave. Python, like Math Lab, relies on Intel’s Math Kernel Library (MKL) in many areas. NumPy in particular suffered a bit here in the past. The Ryzen 7 5800X is ahead of the X3D, no wonder.
The next workload uses Octave, a programming language for scientific computing, to solve a variety of mathematical operations. The bar lengths between the two Ryzen 7s is de facto the same. Here, the X3D can at least almost compensate for the clock disadvantage due to the cache.
- 1 - Introduction and test system
- 2 - Autodesk AutoCAD 2021
- 3 - Autodesk Inventor 2021 Pro
- 4 - Solidworks 2021
- 5 - Various CAD Benchmarks - SPECvieperf 2020
- 6 - Rendering, Financial, Programming
- 7 - Science and Math (1)
- 8 - Science and Math (2)
- 9 - Power consumption and Efficiency
- 10 - Summary and Conclusion
43 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Urgestein
Urgestein
1
Urgestein
Mitglied
Mitglied
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
1
Mitglied
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Veteran
Urgestein
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →