Summary of gaming performance in 720p
As requested, we start in 720p, of course. That’s the way it has to be. Since I’m tired of constantly having to discuss the settings and resolutions, I’ve simply done all four variants again this time, i.e. from Mouse Cinema to Ultra HD. That’s why I’m starting with the lowest resolution, which is often recommended for CPU tests. And you can already see that two CPUs meet almost exactly here. Since I deliberately didn’t follow Intel’s and AMD’s selection, I’m quite satisfied with the cumulative results.
The Ryzen 5 9600X is de facto on a par with the Ryzen 7 7700X and is still around 5 percent ahead of the predecessor CPU. However, the Intel Core i5-14600K is still around 12 percentage points ahead of the Ryzen 5 9600X, despite the performance brake and in contrast to AMD’s films.
The result for P1, i.e. the new Min FPS, is more interesting. Here, the Core i9-14600K is around 25 percent ahead of the Ryzen 5 9600K, which also has to let the Ryzen 7 7700X go due to the lower core count. Yes, there are games where the difference is only in the single-digit percentage range, but there are also games where AMD has to swallow.
Performance metrics of the individual tests
- 1 - Introduction and technical data
- 2 - Test setup and methods
- 3 - Gaming Performance HD Ready (1280 x 720 Pixels)
- 4 - Gaming Performance Full HD (1920 x 1080 Pixels)
- 5 - Gaming Performance WQHD (2560 x 1440 Pixels)
- 6 - Gaming Performance Ultra-HD (3840 x 2160 Pixels)
- 7 - Power consumption and efficiency
- 8 - Temperatures, summary and conclusion
35 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Moderator
1
Neuling
Urgestein
1
Urgestein
Mitglied
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Mitglied
Veteran
Veteran
Mitglied
Veteran
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Mitglied
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →