Color-Performance, Brightness Comparison and Power Consumption
In a direct comparison, the PG32UCDM does not perform well here. This is partly due to the fact that my sample has a poor RGB balance and partly due to the fact that ASUS sends the QD OLED to the customer in wide gamut. ASUS is clearly losing ground here today…
Brightness
In terms of maximum SDR brightness (100 percent window), my sample was not as bright as I expected. However, the 236 nits are still quite ok. Panel lottery?
Gray Scale, Saturation and ColorChecker
Power Consumption
Unlike the PG34WCDM, the PG32UCDM consumes significantly more power when in doubt. If you use this monitor in your home office with large areas of white content, you can expect a power consumption of around 100 watts.
When gaming, the consumption is still higher than that of an LCD monitor (without Mini LED), but it is certainly bearable. You also get an ultra-awesome OLED experience in return! I’ll now try to correct the mess that ASUS has made of this monitor in terms of the RGB balance.
- 1 - Introduction, Features and Specs
- 2 - Workmanship and Details
- 3 - How we measure: Equipment and Methods
- 4 - Pixel Response Times
- 5 - Display Latencies
- 6 - Color-Performance @ Default Settings
- 7 - Direct Comparison and Power Consumption
- 8 - Color-Performance calibrated
- 9 - HDR-Performance
- 10 - Summary and Conclusion
101 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
Mitglied
Moderator
Urgestein
Veteran
Moderator
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Veteran
Urgestein
Mitglied
Veteran
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →