Color-Performance and Brightness Comparison
In a direct comparison of the “out of the box” performance, the MSI MEG342C QD-OLED ranks in the midfield, if you leave the ColorChecker out of the equation. In terms of brightness, you shouldn’t expect miracles from a QD-OLED either. There are 256 nits in SDR, which is completely sufficient in my opinion. However, the QD panel can get quite dark. The 31 nits should also make those who like it very dark happy.
Brightness
Gray Scale, Saturation and ColorChecker
If you now take a look at the power consumption, you can see that an OLED panel likes to suck on the power socket. But you have to look at the whole thing realistically. After all, 125 watts is an extreme scenario for an OLED display. To better classify what I mean by idle:
On average, when gaming or watching an HDR movie, you’re around 50 to 60 watts. But you also have to say that: If, like me, you work with an Excel table (100 percent window) at 200 nits D65, then the MEG342C consumes 70 watts. And you can see how you get to 200 nits with a real D65 on the next page.
- 1 - Introduction, Features and Specs
- 2 - Workmanship and Details
- 3 - How we measure: Equipment and Methods
- 4 - Pixel Response Times
- 5 - Display Latencies
- 6 - Color-Performance @ Default Settings
- 7 - Direct Comparison and Power Consumption
- 8 - Color-Performance calibrated
- 9 - HDR-Performance
- 10 - Summary and Conclusion
52 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Urgestein
Veteran
Moderator
Urgestein
Veteran
Moderator
Moderator
Urgestein
Urgestein
Veteran
Moderator
Urgestein
Urgestein
Moderator
Veteran
Moderator
Moderator
Urgestein
Veteran
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →