Color-Performance and Brightness Comparison
The KTC M27P20P has to take a back seat in this comparison. With an unclamped color space and a white point of 9200K, the performance is really poor. Compared to the Cooler Master, which still holds the best value in terms of gray scaling, KTC really needs to change something.
Brightness
Gray Scale
Saturation
ColorChecker
The minimum brightness of 61 nits is sufficiently low. If you like it very bright, you can burn 600 nits with D65 on your eyes. Values like this are really cool, thanks to the mini-LED. The power consumption is significantly higher compared to an IPS panel without local dimming.
As KTC sets the M27P20P to approx. 400 nits in the factory settings, the power consumption is already very high at idle. If you set the whole thing to 200 nits, you save a whole 30 watts. The 125 watts can only be seen if you burn a white image with almost 1200 nits onto your retina in HDR at 100 percent window size. On average, you will be around 55 watts. It depends on the preferred brightness. You can see how to get to 200 nits on the next page.
- 1 - Introduction, Features and Specs
- 2 - Workmanship and Details
- 3 - How we measure: Equipment and Methods
- 4 - Pixel Response Times
- 5 - Variable Overdrive?
- 6 - Display Latencies
- 7 - Color-Performance @ Default Settings
- 8 - Direct Comparison and Power Consumption
- 9 - Color-Performance calibrated
- 10 - HDR-Performance
- 11 - Summary and Conclusion
113 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
Urgestein
Veteran
Moderator
Urgestein
Veteran
Moderator
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Moderator
Moderator
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →