Rendering with Cinebench, Blender and LuxRender
Even though I don’t really like it because the Cinebench R23 delivers rather inconsistent results, you can of course still make a correct statement in total. The performance of the Ryzen 9 7950X is beyond discussion and speaks for itself. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D can also still present itself usefully within the scope of its possibilities.
The single-thread performance logically shows the expected picture.
Of course, it’s the same as always: a good renderer needs invigorating core fodder, that’s always been the case. My beloved igoBOT is a grateful task there, even if rendering on the CPU is slowly going out of fashion. But before I take things like Cinebench as the sole benchmark, I’d rather run something like that, which also sometimes causes a few minutes of work and delivers very consistent results. And it can also heat.
Once again, we see the Ryzen 9 7950X ramming and rendering virtually everything that didn’t make it to the trees. The new CPU also proves to be well up to the task, but it clearly loses to the Core i9-13900K. But – I’ll spoil this here – no other CPU can solve this more efficiently than the X3D at the moment. So please be patient a little longer.
The Luxmark as a decoupling of the LuxRender suite shows a very similar positioning of both Ryzen CPUs with 16 cores in the score.
LTspiceXVII
New in my benchmark suite is LTspiceXVII, a circuit simulation program. The simulator is designed to run industry standard semiconductor and behavioral models. New circuits can be designed with the integrated schematic capture. Simulation commands and parameters are placed as text on the schematic using common SPICE syntax. Waveforms of circuit nodes and device currents can be recorded by mouse click on the nodes in the schematic during or after simulation.
My thanks here go to our forum member Deridex, who contributed the workload as well as the idea. A total of 16 threads are used in the benchmark, which naturally makes the CPUs with 8 cores and more slip closer together at the top and shifts the focus to the clock. Both X3D models can only lose here.
Encoding, financial service and programming
The first two benchmarks also benefit many cores again, with FSI being pure compute. The Ryzen 9 7950X is only just behind the model without cache. This fits perfectly, especially since the power consumption is significantly lower.
In Python and even more so Octave, Intel used to be the measure of all things, now they are no longer. Python, like Math Lab, relies on Intel’s Math Kernel Library (MKL) in many areas. NumPy in particular suffered a bit here in the past. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is in the midfield, after all. The cache doesn’t help much if the clock is missing.
The next workload uses Octave, a programming language for scientific computing, to solve a variety of mathematical operations. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D really collapses, for whatever reason. Wrong CCD and thus too little tact? It is reproducible, unfortunately.
- 1 - Introduction, installation and technical data
- 2 - Chipset, motherboard and test bench
- 3 - Gaming Performance HD Ready (1280 x 720 Pixels)
- 4 - Gaming Performance Full HD (1920 x 1080 Pixels)
- 5 - Gaming Performance WQHD (2560 x 1440 Pixels)
- 6 - Gaming Performance Ultra-HD (3840 x 2160 Pixels)
- 7 - Autodesk AutoCAD 2021
- 8 - Autodesk Inventor 2021 Pro
- 9 - Rendering, Simulation, Financial, Programming
- 10 - Scientific and math workloads
- 11 - Power consumption and efficiency
- 12 - Summary and conclusion
229 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Mitglied
1
Urgestein
1
Urgestein
Mitglied
Urgestein
Mitglied
Neuling
Urgestein
Urgestein
Veteran
Neuling
Urgestein
Urgestein
1
Mitglied
Urgestein
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →