Performance in 1280 x 720 pixels resolution (“720p”) and provoked CPU limit
First, let’s look at the normalized and cumulative average FPS. The emulated Core i5-12400 is only just behind the direct competitor in the form of the Ryzen 5 5600X in 720p here, although the relation to the QS of the Core i5-12400 could also mean that a final BIOS or a retail CPU could still be a blink of an eye faster. Aver even so, that’s already a de facto tie.
If you take a look at the normalized percentages, then the almost negligible 3.3 percentage points gap to the Ryzen 5 5600X isn’t something that can’t be compensated for at least to some extent with a bit faster RAM. The Core i5-12400 only fails here because of the somewhat slowed down Turbo clock.
Much more interesting, however, is the value for 1% low FPS, i.e. the first percentile (P1). Here, the Core i5-12400 only has a gap of 1 percentage point, which is within the tolerance limits. So it’s kind of a real tie.
Performance in 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution (“1080p”) and CPU and GPU limit
The gap only narrows, but the Core i5-12400 can now get razor-thinly ahead of the Ryzen 5 5600X in the much more practical 1080p. What a precision landing, Intel has apparently looked very closely!
Expressed in percentages, the Intel CPU’s lead is now a barely measurable 0.2 percentage points, and it really is a true tie in the end when you think about the tolerances.
However, one way of looking at it that puts the Core i5-12400 clearly and of course measurably ahead is the evaluation of the Min-FPS, the so-called P1. Here, Intel can add almost 5 percentage points to the Core i9-12400 compared to the Ryzen 5 5600X. Sure, they’re not galaxies yet, but they’re a lot.
Performance in 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution (“1440p”) and GPU limit
You can already see very clearly that the CPU actually hardly plays a role in the average FPS, which are all very close together. Except for the P1, but I’ll get to that in a minute.
In absolute terms, the 1.3 percentage points between the Core i5-12400 and the Ryzen 5 5600X is still almost within tolerance, even though the result remained consistent over a few runs. So the average FPS still fits for a more or less exact tie.
If it weren’t for the inferior P1 and the darn Min FPS from AMD’s point of view! It is still almost 4 percentage points that AMD is missing on Intel. More or less pronounced depending on the game, but not entirely negligible in the aggregate.
- 1 - Introduction, Test System and Methods
- 2 - 720p - Gaming Performance
- 3 - 720p - Power Draw and Efficiency in each Game
- 4 - 1080p - Gaming Performance
- 5 - 1080p - Power Draw and Efficiency in each Game
- 6 - 1440p - Gaming Performance
- 7 - 1440p - Power Draw and Efficiency in each Game
- 8 - Overall Gaming Performance and Comparison
- 9 - Summary of Power Consumption and Efficiency
- 10 - Conclusion and Final Words (for now)
39 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Mitglied
Urgestein
Urgestein
Veteran
1
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Veteran
Veteran
Mitglied
Veteran
Mitglied
1
Veteran
Veteran
Mitglied
Urgestein
Veteran
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →