Gaming performance in Full HD (1920 x 1080 pixels)
When cold, the GeForce RTX 3080 laptop is still on par with the RTX 3060 Ti FE, but under longer load and at full operating temperature, the boost clock drops a bit. So you end up just behind the RTX 3060 Ti as a desktop GPU, although the difference is almost negligible. For a mobile solution, that’s really decent, especially since the TDP of 150 watts (+15 watts via Dynamic Boost) is clearly below the desktop GPU’s data. But more on that in a moment. Measurements were generally taken in performance mode.
When comparing performance in percentage points, the RTX 3080 laptop GPU is just under 3 percentage points behind the RTX 3060 Ti as a desktop CPU. This is measurable, but in normal operation you will hardly notice it subjectively, if at all.
Gaming performance in WQHD (2560 x 1440 pixels)
Interestingly, the gap between the RTX 3080 laptop GPU and the RTX 3060 Ti desktop increases a tiny bit after connecting an external monitor and in WQHD when the GPU reaches its final temperature after the warm-up process, but this is also due to the slightly higher graphics load. This also shows that the notebook is only subject to minor limitations with the higher resolution and that a WQHD panel with 144 Hz is certainly the better solution. Such a panel will replace the current Full HD panel in late summer, which is a sensible decision.
Again, in purely percentage terms, there are no major surprises. The gap increases to almost 5 percent, whereby the desktop card can definitely benefit from the higher power limit and better cooling.
Interim summary
For a notebook, both results are really really good, because the Max-Q design could not keep up at all here. We’ll see how it all looks now in terms of power consumption and efficiency on the next page. Let me surprise you!
18 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Urgestein
1
Neuling
1
Urgestein
Neuling
1
Neuling
Mitglied
Urgestein
Mitglied
Urgestein
Veteran
Neuling
1
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →