Aircooling Basics Cooling Reviews Wärmeleitpaste und Pads Watercooling

Roundup with 5 phase change pads: Honeywell PTM7950, PTM7950SP, OEM PCM5000, PCM8500 and Thermalright Heilos Review

Today we are going to take a close look at five different phase transition pads and add them to the upcoming database. With the two PCM5000 and PCM8500, I am also testing two OEM pads with a thickness of 0.2 mm, which are sometimes cheekily sold as Honeywell (AliExpress, eBay), but are pure OEM products from a third-party supplier and as such are legally included in many labeled products. In addition to the Honeywell PTM7950 already tested, there is also the Honeywell PTM7950SP as a very viscous paste, which is also advertised as a PTM. The Thermalright Heilos completes today’s quintet, as a real gelid pad with a validatable origin was unfortunately not available by the deadline.

Phase Change Material (PCM) or Phase Transition Material (PTM)?

Phase Change Materials (PCM) are materials that can change their physical phase (e.g. solid, liquid, gaseous) at a certain temperature, thereby storing or releasing large amounts of thermal energy. They are mainly used for temperature control and energy storage, e.g. to prevent overheating in electronic devices and batteries. During the phase transition (e.g. from solid to liquid), the PCM absorbs or releases a considerable amount of latent heat without the temperature of the material changing significantly. For those who are not yet familiar with this, here’s a practical example: there are these great pocket warmers that can be bent in the winder in the solid state so that they then release the energy previously stored during heating from the liquid to the solid state. It is therefore a kind of latent heat accumulator. It is sometimes incorrectly stated that PCM is better as a heat conducting pad because it can initially store the heat and use it for the phase transition, but this is completely wrong.

Phase transition materials (PTMs), on the other hand, are materials that undergo phase transitions between different structural or electronic states. The phase transition in PTMs leads to a change in the physical or chemical structure of the material, which influences its properties in a targeted manner. But this is exactly what we actually need as a heat conducting pad! In PCMs we find the classic phase transition between classic aggregate states (solid, liquid), in PTMs the phase transition between different structural states. Or, to put it in a nutshell: PCM is used to absorb or release latent heat, PTM utilizes the change in physical properties without significant heat aspects. So let’s agree on the term PTM, even if some suppliers have not yet internalized this.

Honeywell PTM7950

Many manufacturers have been experimenting with the Honeywell PTM7950 thermal pad and graphene pads on graphics cards for some time now. With good success, as demonstrated above all by AMD board partners (and AMD on the MBA cards) or MSI. Paste or no paste, the load on graphics cards in particular is far too heavy a burden for many normal pastes in the long term. In addition to the horizontal forces caused by the very different expansion coefficients of the chip and heatsink (which is why, for example, 1000 cycles are tested), it is above all the higher temperatures and direct contact with the substrate without an extra heatspreader that are important here. Ageing effects such as pump-out, drying out and simple chemical degradation are not something that today’s GPUs really like in the long term. In addition to the 0.25 mm thick pad, you also get a couple of adhesive aids for applying smaller sections, which is really helpful (especially the 1 cm x 1 cm on the TIMA5 are very fiddly). The pad was neatly packaged in a durable box.

Honeywell PTM7950SP

This PTM paste is actually a hybrid, because on the one hand it is a very viscous paste and on the other hand it has the properties of a phase transition material (PTM). The advantage lies in the slightly better filling of unevenness and gaps, where the 0.25 mm thin pad already fails, but the thermal resistance is somewhat higher and you really have to have skills when applying it. For the rest, what has already been said about the PTM7950 applies. But I’m curious to see whether it will be a viable alternative.

Incidentally, the origin is interesting here. A Shenzhen Esamconn Electronics Co., Ltd. is listed as the “producer”, but based on various searches, it is purely a reseller of all sorts of things and does not manufacture anything itself. So either this PTM paste is an extremely successful counterfeit, or the original has been bottled and sold, although based on the properties measured and the chemical composition, I would rather guess the original. But either way, it is representative, but of course I have to mention it. The accessories look very extensive with spatulas, screwdrivers and brushes, but you shouldn’t be dazzled, because you can get all this for less than 10 cents when you buy it.

Thermalright Heilos

This pad is not a Honeywell PTM, but some deviating OEM pad of medium quality. We will see that it does what it is supposed to do, but cannot deliver top performance. This is due to many features, which I will show in detail later. I also don’t want to spoil anything yet. The pad thickness is 0.2 mm, whereby you have to use 175 µm and less, because otherwise there is not enough contact for a clean burn-in. And no, it’s not Helios, as the packaging suggests. Spelling mistake or marketing gag?

PCM5000 OEM and PCM8500 OEM

These two OEM pads are often labeled and are also widely used in this and similar forms by other third-party suppliers. PTM is not witchcraft and so the very cheap, very dark PCM5000 is exemplary with all its weaknesses for the cheap entry-level variants of the Chinese market, while the lighter PCM8500 was quite convincing and can at least come closer to the Honeywell PTM7950 than the other three products. Let us surprise you.
 
PCM5000
PCM8500

Technical data

As there are no data sheets worthy of the name except for Honeywell products, we’d better concentrate on the real results, which I don’t want to spoil, so I’ll leave this point out for now. But the real measurement results are just around the corner, so stay curious and keep reading!

Further links and basics

Kommentar

Lade neue Kommentare

p
pinkymee

Mitglied

88 Kommentare 85 Likes

Danke für die echt spannenden Tests. Erschreckend, was für Blender auf dem Markt für teuer Geld verkauft werden. Gut dass es Dich (Igor) gibt, der nun endlich Klarheit und Transparenz in diesen Teil des Marktes bringt :) (und das vermutlich sehr zum Leidwesen der Anbieter ;) )

Antwort 2 Likes

l
letauch

Mitglied

13 Kommentare 15 Likes

Ahoi,

wo bekommt der geneigte Käufer denn nun mit hoher Sicherheit das Original Honeywell PTM7950

Grüße
letauch

Antwort 6 Likes

m
moritzi

Mitglied

11 Kommentare 3 Likes

Interessante Tests, bin jedes Mal wieder überrascht was es so alles am Markt gibt (und in welchen Qualitäten).
Bis jetzt läuft noch alles gut und kühl, aber beim nächsten Upgrade bzw. wenn die Temperaturen nicht mehr so passen werde ich mich an den Artikel erinnern und so ein Pad verwenden.

Antwort 1 Like

Igor Wallossek

1

10,709 Kommentare 20,231 Likes

Es muss nicht Honeywell sein, es gibt auch Alternativen, und zwar im Original :)
Kannst Dich ja auch für einen Test bewerben, da ist gerade ein Thread online

Antwort 1 Like

DigitalBlizzard

Urgestein

2,962 Kommentare 1,780 Likes

Danke für den aufschlussreichen Test @Igor Wallossek , bin völlig Deiner Meinung was die Anwendung betrifft, DirectToDie auf Grafikkarten oder Notebooks können gute Pads eine sinnvolle Alternative darstellen, auf CPUs performen gute Pasten einfach besser.
Und vor "alternativen Einsatzbedingungen" z.B. als Putty Ersatz würde ich klar abraten.
Gute Puttys sind am Ende auf einfach besser und haben einen deutlich besseren Filler Effekt.
Und der Hinweis auf die Hersteller Originale ist auch wichtig, denn Fakes und Nachahmer sind reichlich unterwegs.
Unsere MorpheX sind z.B. immer originale aus gutem Hause ( Dow Corning Gruppe ) und müssen sich gerade im Usertest beweisen. Was sie gerade auf Notebooks und Grafikkarten mit sehr großem Erfolg und teilweise auch für uns überraschenden Ergebnissen tun.
Du hast sie ja auch selbst da und kannst die Unterschiede sicher selbst besser beurteilen.

Aber Fazit ist, Pad kann, da wo es sinnvoll ist eine gute Langzeitlösung sein, ersetzt aber aus meiner Sicht auf CPUs keinesfalls gute Pasten, in den Temperaturtests real haben die guten Pasten die wir alle mit StenciX testen, die Pads fast immer geschlagen. Ausnahmen bestätigen die Regel .

Antwort 1 Like

Klicke zum Ausklappem
e
eastcoast_pete

Urgestein

1,783 Kommentare 1,115 Likes

Gibt's scheinbar bei dem Internet Store des wohl bekanntesten Youtuber zum Thema PC (Linus) zu erwerben, allerdings zu einem (IMHO) schon sehr stolzem Preis: https://www.lttstore.com/products/ptm7950-phase-change-thermal-pad?_pos=1&_psq=therm&_ss=e&_v=1.0
Der Hauptvorteil, es (wenn's denn sein muss) hier zu kaufen ist, daß es ziemlich sicher das Honeywell PTM 7950 ist. Aber teuer sind die Pads da, und wie!

Antwort 1 Like

ssj3rd

Veteran

234 Kommentare 163 Likes

Antwort 3 Likes

¿∞¡

Veteran

160 Kommentare 40 Likes

Schön und gut solche Tests. Sind sie doch eher was für Liebhaber der Statistiken und Diagramme als für Praktiker.

Leider beinhaltet dieser Test nur ein einziges Pad, welches ein Normalsterblicher jemals in die Hände bekommen wird.
Und über die Längzeiteigenschaften, Anwendungshaptik und zu erwartenden Ergebnisse im Praxiseinsatz kann man nur spekulieren.

Verirrt sich doch so mancher auf der Suche nach dem heiligen Gral und wartet insgeheim einfach nur auf den leuchtenden Stern.

Antwort Gefällt mir

roccale

Mitglied

89 Kommentare 58 Likes

An 80x80 piece with shipping (yes shipping is not free) costs 54 euros....
I have known that site for years, I have already bought from it in the past, in fact free shipping seemed strange to me.

I recommend again :

Antwort 2 Likes

Klicke zum Ausklappem
RevAngel

Veteran

126 Kommentare 91 Likes

edit: "kommende Datenbank"
Meine Frage wo die ist erübrigt sich also (noch)

Danke für den Test @Igor Wallossek !

Antwort 1 Like

s
silenthunter

Mitglied

16 Kommentare 5 Likes

@Igor Wallossek hast du getestet bzw. an alle, gibt es Erfahrungen ob es einen Unterschied macht, wann das Pad durch den Burn-In geht?
Nen Kühler ziehe ich ja zuerst an, dann Burn-In. Sollte man im warmen Zustand noch einmal nachziehen?
Aut der TIMA erfolgt ja zuerst der Burn-In und dann kommt im warmen Zustand der Druck, oder?

Antwort Gefällt mir

Snarks Domain

Mitglied

25 Kommentare 32 Likes

Caplinq.com is a distributor of Honeywell. They apparently distribute 3 common thicknesses of Honeywell PTM7950, 0.20mm, 0.25mm, and 0.30mm.

Antwort Gefällt mir

M
Midnight Angel

Mitglied

76 Kommentare 46 Likes

Umm... according to @Igor Wallossek, the PTM7950 is available in 0.25mm, 0.25mm and 0.25mm.

So, unless Igor is mistaken, what are these pads 0.20mm or 0.30mm thick?
Color me confused...

Antwort Gefällt mir

Snarks Domain

Mitglied

25 Kommentare 32 Likes

I'm only going off of what a Caplinq.com representative told me via email. On their website they only list 0.25mm and 0.20mm

Antwort 1 Like

Case39

Urgestein

2,572 Kommentare 980 Likes

CB erklärt uns die Welt...😂

Antwort Gefällt mir

Danke für die Spende



Du fandest, der Beitrag war interessant und möchtest uns unterstützen? Klasse!

Hier erfährst Du, wie: Hier spenden.

Hier kannst Du per PayPal spenden.

About the author

Igor Wallossek

Editor-in-chief and name-giver of igor'sLAB as the content successor of Tom's Hardware Germany, whose license was returned in June 2019 in order to better meet the qualitative demands of web content and challenges of new media such as YouTube with its own channel.

Computer nerd since 1983, audio freak since 1979 and pretty much open to anything with a plug or battery for over 50 years.

Follow Igor:
YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter

Werbung

Werbung