What... 1.35V? This is nuts!open Powerlimit + TDV-tweak@1,35V should be enough, Sylwester had only 1275mV, but good cooling
and
disable ds gfxclk
Not really so.should be nearly the same effort as with TDV
2800 MHz bei der 6800 XT.I just wanna know what is the actual Fmax without EVC, 2750 or 2800?
Any links to screenshots of running apps along with telemetry data or some other info that would confirm this?2800 MHz bei der 6800 XT.
Yeah, not very convincingly, to say the least )Not from me. Believe it or not.
Doesn't bother me, to say the least.Yeah, not very convincingly, to say the least )
Nice seeing you too.Doesn't bother me, to say the least.
Indeed )I am now sure that I made my scores with EVC2.
It's easy to check. The GFX clock should go over 2750 if I increase voltage further.if the Volts are high enough@open Powerlimit, may be there is a spike in the run (x)
look at sylwester, max. gfx clock is higher then avg
2000mstelemetrie@HWinfo in what milliseconds?
I see. This looks more like a sudden gfx occupancy drop that causes the clock to jump, rather than an unexpected spike - 3mhz difference is well within a margin of error, or rather due to the different polling rate in 3dm and hwi.sometimes there is a little spike at the end of GT1
takes some run´s to find a run with this exception
Are you asking me?Wie sind eigentlich die erf. Anpassungen für die 6800xt, wenn man die 6950-Curven benutzt?
I did that too, but nvmI asked redF because he did as first User the test with 6950-Curve@6800xt.
You may be aware of this, but UL calculates the average clocks across all three tests in TS, so their reported average GFX or VRAM freq. are of little use.for example in the attachement
the GFX-Clock is max but Vram goes yet in DS, = no idea how UL reads this